Opinions CHATEAU DE SEREVILLE La Belliole

tout simplement génial - le domaine est immense, bien entretenu, de la forêt à perte de de vue... green green green... que de la verdure et nous avons vraiment adoré cette forêt, le chapiteau Bambou somptueux d'élégance, la demeure est tout également élégante... l'ensemble est aéré, lumineux, un chic discret, le vrai quoi ! Merci à nos mariés, merci mes bons amis et bravo pour ce choix, la classe quoi !
ps des hôtes charmants... !! voir les commentaires sur tripadvisor...

Un domaine remarquable en pleine forêt, notre mariage fut magique et tel que nous l'avions rêvé - surtout, les hôtes sont bienveillants et nous ont beaucoup aidé dans les préparatifs - ce qui rend le commentaire négatif en effet assez douteux

Un mariage absolument parfait - des hôtes exquis et chaleureux que nous avons même invités - un cadre enchanteur... tout ce que nous avions rêvé - les commentaires sur Trip.AD nous ayant bien aidé car nous doutons que le petit futé soit si futé pour laisser paraître un commentaire assez douteux sur Séréville. Merci à leurs hôtes

Maginifique gâche setting by a dismaying management

We have just celebrated our wedding at the castle of Séréville. The setting is charming, a little outdated and suitable for events oriented towards a rural-chic style. During the first visits, we met the owners Christian and Jean-Marie. Charming first, we find them a little intrusive in their ways and their advice. We did not want to pay attention to that, probably by our passion for the place. Moreover, we were not very specific in procedures and their tolerance let us accept a good relationship.

The D-day day before, we are able to prepare the places and to find us with our families and our friends. During the circuit of the owner, we feel that the tone changed and that a certain unexpected hardness is entrance in their way of addressing the word to us. We were warned: the preceding combination led to a conflict between them and the grooms. We think that it must be because of an excessive behavior of the fast livers and that we will not have troubles. However, the D-day we will realize that it is not inevitably true.

Initially, Christian and Jean Marie block a way between parking and the castle so that the guests cannot park themselves inside the park "because it is better" and this, without us to inform. Ghost of the town hall and in haste to receive our guests for the reception we decide not to protest. We would not have had. Firstly because the guests having driving difficulties or those older suffered from it, then because was to leave the open house day to a sequence of most unpleasant. Indeed, the guests who had made the choice to install their tents rather than to choose the dormitory had the surprise visit of the owners. Although there was not of exchange, it was an awkward surprise when we thought of enjoying the place according to conventions of rental. Then, their dog came to visit to us to urinate on the tent in bamboo which served as reception venue for the banquet. I thus went toquer on their premises in order to state to them that their dog was in freedom (thank you for the guests being afraid of the dogs) and after having had much evil to obtain an answer, I were accepted without any excuse of their share. I put that on an awkwardness due to the embarrassment.

Such as agreed in the contract, we stopped broadcasting music in the tent at midnight and we therefore set the dance floor inside the building to reduce the noise. Around 4:00 am, my guests tell me that the owner is spirit to close the shutters of the building where we are. Here me is therefore spirit to find it in my turn to first understand this intrusion without notice (at least a phone call, or talk to us) in the setting of a rental contract, and then why such a gesture while we respect all needs that were given to us in the contract. I do not find it and decided not to disturb it in my turn. After very if this attitude is very unpleasant, it is not decisive for the rest of the night. Finally 5:00, the owner was revived and tells me that it music and that you need be reasonable must stop. I meet him that no, we have a rental contract to enjoy the place until the next day evening. It is made dizzy. I meet him at the cost of the rental, it is a minimum of to respect the expectations of a wedding, including noise. It irritates, pushes me and when I prevent him that I will not tolerate any physical pressure, it rut on the cupboard of the tower breaker and cut electricity. It is 5:00 in the morning, guests are my shocked by the stage and I find myself blocked facing this behaviour of most contemptible. Finally, we manage to obtain the right to continue on condition that lowering sound and closing all the windows. It is 6:00 am and my guests, still very forms some, will sets deafened by this at the same time they are absurd and hysterical episode.

If you want to rent the castle, I highly recommend you raviser. Our association was perfect, and yet it remains a very bitter taste. People who rent over 6000 € their castle for weddings but who want to impose their limits to an aggressive way can really affect the spirit of sharing that you will want to give your wedding. These two people are to be fled without any hesitation.

Bucolic and romantic - warm welcome